Replies

"But to tear down all of the people who have carried the conservative standard for decades (Rush, Levin, Sowell, et al.) is foolish in the extreme. When you've burned down all of the other trees in the forest in order to protect yours, where will you shelter when the winds come?"

So you think it is okay for Rush and Levin and Sowell to tear down and rip to shreds one candidate, and express support for another candidate, but it is not okay for anyone else to strongly disagree with them?

If/when they make mistakes (like when expressing things when they are suffering from addiction to drugs, or when they somehow failed to mention a little conflict of interest in their rantings), you don't think others should point those grievous mistakes out to them?

And if others simply disagree with those public radio or written word political pundits, you think they should not express their disagreement with those pundits? Do you think they are always right, and never wrong?

Show me where Rush has torn down any candidate. Show me where he has endorsed any candidate. Seriously, show me! He has been very careful not to do so, as he will eventually support whoever the primary winner is (as always). The vitriol directed at Rush in particular is specifically because he won't tear down the candidates other than Trump, and because he dares to mention Trump's negatives along with the negatives of the other candidates. This isn't a case of "Rush is attacking Trump" and you know it! The attacks on Rush have been because he refuses to favor Trump. And that's the stupidity in action here: tear them all down in order to protect one candidate...