Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin
And that describes precisely what Trump is saying:

In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that journalists may not be sued successfully by public officials for libel unless their news coverage was false, damaged a reputation and was published with “actual malice.” That meant establishing that the defamation was published “with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.” The Court concluded that such protection was necessary to preserve open debate and discussion about government policy and conduct. Without that protection, the First Amendment guarantee of a free press was largely subject to widely disparate state laws, none of which provided a similar shield against lawsuits.

117 posted on 02/27/2016 2:35:12 PM PST by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]


To: gg188
I might add that more people than ever wish to apply this same legal reasoning to the promises of candidates running for public office:

"Elect me and we will repeal Obamacare. Elect me and I will seal the Border..." Etc. The founders did not intend for free speech to provide cover for defrauding voters.

125 posted on 02/27/2016 2:37:05 PM PST by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson