To: SkyPilot
My only response is a question...
Are elected and appointed criminals immune to the long standing violations of fiduciary responsibility/obligations laws?
30 posted on
02/27/2016 2:45:53 PM PST by
publius911
(IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
To: publius911
http://www.hangthebankers.com/government-preparing-to-seize-401k-retirement-plans/ "The case, Tibble vs Edison, has set the stage for what could be a very slippery slope a slope on which the U.S. government could intervene whenever it believes a 401(k) is not adequately performing. It has many asking questions: If we have another stock market crash on par with 2008 (as some are predicting for this year) would the government step in when 401(k)s suffer any kind of substantial loss? Might the government take control of those plans of course, all in the name of protecting consumers and in turn move the funds into Treasury securities? I know some of you are likely thinking, Thats ludicrous, they would never do that! But after reading what economist Martin Armstrong wrote in reaction to the Supreme Court ruling, in an article boldly titled Kiss Your Pension Fund Goodbye, you may think again.Kiss Your Pension Fund Goodbye
44 posted on
02/27/2016 5:20:41 PM PST by
SkyPilot
("I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." John 14:6)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson