Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueNgold

Sounds like a reasonable analysis. I remember people thinking that the rule would stop Trump - but I also remembered in the past that many proportional states are still top-heavy (like SC). So, I didn’t see a problem for Trump.

Obviously they didn’t have Trump in mind when they set the rules for this year - but they did worry about Cruz or someone like him ‘causing trouble’ as they see it - oh well, as they say: Even the best laid plans...


4 posted on 02/27/2016 12:10:38 PM PST by BobL (This is no longer a Policy Wonk election, it is a MOVEMENT. Vote for the hat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BobL

Just another example of how big, centralized plans can have unintended consequences.


43 posted on 02/27/2016 1:34:06 PM PST by Personal Responsibility (We need a separation of press and state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson