It would be easy to prove malice in that case since they would have no evidence and they would know that publishing such a scurrilous lie would hurt my reputation. That is why they would never publish that story because I would easily be able to sue them for libel under current law.
How do you prove malice, when they had “no reason” to go after you?
“It was an accident, anyway.”
“That is why they would never publish that story because I would easily be able to sue them for libel under current law.”
Ok, how about if the media spent years and decades fostering class hatred, degenerate life-styles, failed economic systems, racial hatred, ethnic strife, one party over the other, outright lies, and big wasteful government at all levels, in the news, non-news and educational media, could you sue them for that under “current law”?