Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just mythoughts
And how would you react if this idea was floated by Obama, Clinton, Reid, or Pelosi? See, the problem with changing a law to benefit someone you trust is it's also changed for someone you can't trust. Denying someone the freedom to call Trump a new Mussolini (an opinion, by the way, that I don't share. He reminds me much more of Juan Peron) means the freedom to call Hillary Clinton a criminal psychotic power hungry neo-Stalinist ugly shrew would also be subject to legal sanction. Any speculation about Harry Reid's ties to organized crime would be libelous. And mention Obama's frolics in Chicago bathhouses? Forget it.

To paraphrase the old saying about God and killing in combat, allow it all to be said and let the listeners sort it out.

159 posted on 02/27/2016 11:45:07 AM PST by katana (Just my opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: katana

Presently, liberals use the IRS to control speech. I just happen to believe the commandment against bearing false witness applies to all. I do not believe free speech entitles me to lie.


187 posted on 02/27/2016 1:07:05 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson