Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TRUMP UNIVERSITY HAS A 98% APPROVAL RATING.
NinetyEight Per Cent Approval ^ | February 27, 2016 | Staff

Posted on 02/27/2016 3:26:09 AM PST by true believer forever

In the case of Trump University, the situation is even more disturbing. While Schneiderman’s investigation into Trump University first arose out of a larger inquiry into for-profit schools that accepted federal funding, his office quickly learned that neither Trump University nor its students had ever received any form of federal funding, subsidies or other government aid and offered all of its students a 3 day money back guarantee if they were not completely satisfied. Despite learning these facts, for the last two years, Schneiderman’s office has spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars conducting a no holds barred, scorched earth investigation, assigning as many as ten of his staff members to interview former Trump University employees and review literally hundreds of thousands of pages of documents. Making matters worse, Schneiderman chose to devote such valuable taxpayer dollars to looking into Trump University even though there was already a class action lawsuit pending in California brought by the firm of disgraced former lawyers and convicted felons Bill Lerach and Mel Weiss.

And what did Schneiderman’s office find after wasting so much of the taxpayers’ hard earned money? Exactly what Trump University told the Attorney General on day one – that as much as 98% of those students who participated in Trump University programs were not only satisfied with their Trump University experience, but would recommend the program to a friend.

(Excerpt) Read more at 98percentapproval.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: albertogonzales; asmuchas; cynthiakern; ericschneiderman; gonzalocuriel; laraza; presidentdonaldtrump; repositorytrump; seriouslyreally; testimonials; trump; trumpu; trumpuniversity; university
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Albion Wilde

Yeah and I an Apollo Astronaut, with a PHD in recognizing BS. Everyone, ‘ceptin JimRob are all the same here.

What you think no one else actually reads the Trump dribble you post?


121 posted on 02/27/2016 3:40:42 PM PST by X-spurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

Have a blessed weekend, X-spurt.


122 posted on 02/27/2016 4:47:19 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
Juseph Wharton, founder of Wharton School

Should be Joseph Wharton. Pardon the typo!

123 posted on 02/27/2016 4:49:35 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: firebrand
I knew there was no connection. Just pretending to be woo-woo.

I did realize that, and just wanted to expand on it for people who may not know about that. Kristinn once upbraided me for going into too much detail. Seems it would apply here! No offense meant!

124 posted on 02/27/2016 4:52:21 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Never called you an idiot. Evidently you don’t comprehend the written word.


125 posted on 02/27/2016 6:08:39 PM PST by freedomjusticeruleoflaw (Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
Well, personally, I am a mouth breathing knuckle dragger, uninformed, drooling, minimal IQ, retard idiot, approved by CW hisself as being so,with no principles and definitely not a continual consistent conservative, but I can still recognize an as whole when I meet one.

You, my esteemed high IQ rock of gibraltar, are an as whole.

126 posted on 02/27/2016 7:17:39 PM PST by going hot (Happiness is a Momma Deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Cruz supporters, otoh, are like a rabid fanboi/fangrrrl club and seem to know absolutely nothing about the real Trump, and like to believe only hit pieces and GOPe/Dem/MSM propaganda. They’re sort of like cult followers.

I must agree about the ones who post on most of the threads, although there are Cruz supporters who restrain themselves from the constant negativity. The other shocker to me is -- I thought it was only liberals who project all the time, but the projection of some of these folks is just appalling.

127 posted on 02/27/2016 8:38:39 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: freedomjusticeruleoflaw

You’re new here. It shows. Can the personal insults and you may last.


128 posted on 02/27/2016 9:33:12 PM PST by Albion Wilde (Who can actually defeat the Democrats in 2016? -- the most important thing about all candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
I find it interesting that anecdotes from a poster carry less weight with you than allegations from a highly partisan state AG

Ohh I looked. I also checked the FR poster history to see if he had bias for Trump. I found plenty of evidence that he did (in radical favor of Trump). This is an election year and people will say anything to cover the tracks of someone they like.

Just as I checked your posting history to see if you just as wild. I found that you probable support Trump, but you are not radical about it and have a history of sticking to subjects that interest you which often resides outside the scope of just politics.

So I am going to assume your statement to be legit somewhat. If phrased to be a question, I would read it to ask "What makes you take the word of the liberal AG over the FR commentor?".

Answer: I don't exactly take the AG's word over said Freeper, but I do think the AG would be talking to actual people that did go to this unaccredited school (or whatever it is). I would hope the AG does have some backing of truth to cover his tracks because Trump is not one to shy away from suing if misrepresented. Trump has the pockets to do it and the motivation to save face in an election year, so you better not be making crap up.

Since it is an election year, all things are suspect of course, as possible being politically motivated. Could a bunch of liberals join together to try to muddy the water, sure, it is possible, but perhaps would of took a lot more planning than really is in the realm of really feasible. The odds that they knew in advance Trump was going to run so they could enlist in a program with his name on it just for the sake of trying to derail a possible future presidential run is asking a lot of a liberal. Not saying there is not some smart crafty liberals, but you have to admit it is a stretch.

Anyhoo, just saying yes I did take in consideration the FR opinion. I did what little research time allotted to see if I thought their opinion was relevant to hold in high esteem. I found yourself a more worthy person to respond to, since I think you motives are more based in getting to the truth of the matter. Truth, which I think true conservatives are interested in knowing, so I answered as truthfully as I knew how (giving I didn't really want to invest a lot of time in doing so, because the subject is not really that high a priority for me).

The answer given to me from said member basically said, they went to lots of similar programs. That they were not subject to being required to fill out evaluations forms as the AG said Trump University people were. I asked myself how relevant that information was (source reliable, and did his have first hand information). Both answers were on shaky ground. The AG as rightfully suspect for political reason I also vetted. With the information given I could not come to a concrete decision. I just wanted to arm myself with both sides of the story. Again, time limitations do not allow each of us to be experts, thus we speculate on a forum.

I tend to ramble at times and don't proofread as well as I should.

129 posted on 02/27/2016 10:19:36 PM PST by LowOiL (Woe to you when all men speak well of you, for that is how their fathers treated the false prophets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

A fair reply, FRiend. It wasn’t really a question so much as an observation, but I appreciate your taking the time to explain your thought process.


130 posted on 02/28/2016 5:30:57 AM PST by MortMan (Let's call the push for amnesty what it is: Pedrophilia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Trump University has a 98% approval rating. I could have settled but won't out of principle!

 

131 posted on 02/29/2016 2:48:49 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson