Listen to yourself! You are, in essence, saying that an inconsistency in position should be a disqualifier. Of all of the candidates, the one you favor has been the most inconsistent on positions of any of them. You’ve somehow divined Cruz’ position has changed on amnesty. You probably mocked him for standing on principle in Iowa when he stood up to ethanol mandates. (Because that’s what a sellout does. Not!) Which president Trump will we get? The one who favors a mandate or the one who doesn’t? The one who favors gun control or the one who doesn’t? The one who thinks Planned Parenthood “does great work” or the one that’s pro-life? The one who says establishment is good? Why does Trump say he no longer eats Oreos? Because Nabisco moved to Mexico. He later went on to say in justifying his clothing manufacturing being in Mexico that it’s smart business when HE does it! I don’t believe that men are infallible. You believe only Trump is infallible.
So all that talk about how evil the Gang of 8 were... that means nothing?
All that concern about amnesty... that means nothing?