Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt

But the employer dropped the ball and didn’t preserve evidence. So it’s Apple’s duty to cooperate with court orders while addressing the privacy issue by keeping secure the in-house backdoor tool which they already undoubtedly have.


11 posted on 02/24/2016 8:39:34 PM PST by Carismar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Carismar

There is no back door.


12 posted on 02/24/2016 8:42:22 PM PST by kempo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Carismar

I’m not sure .. Rush had mentioned that the main problem was that the owner of the phone has control over it’s security .. not Apple.

Therefore, Apple would have to write special software just to be able to enter the phone and retrieve the data. And, if they have to write new software .. that leaves them open to all types of security issues.

Now, I don’t have an iPhone, but Rush does and has had for a long time. I’m just recounting his info.


15 posted on 02/24/2016 8:52:42 PM PST by CyberAnt ("Peace Through Strength")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson