Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Negligent in Nevada?
The National Review ^ | February 24, 2016 | Tim Alberta

Posted on 02/24/2016 1:14:25 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife

Got iot. Point out the facts to Cruz propaganda bots, get an infantile snark in response.

And then you wonder why you are losing?


81 posted on 02/24/2016 5:02:23 AM PST by MNJohnnie ( Tyranny, like Hell, is not easily conquered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: patq

Nope, the Trumpanzees Klan people were from NYC!


82 posted on 02/24/2016 5:02:58 AM PST by Beagle8U (Trumpanzees Lives Matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

You are a paid Establishment / Elitist operative.


83 posted on 02/24/2016 5:06:35 AM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
I question the "voting twice" claim. Ballots were supposed to be controled precint captians. To get a ballot, you had to ID yourself, and your name had to appear on the roll. Your name is checked off. I assume some people deposited more than one ballot, but that does not mean they voted more than one. For example, out of a man-woman couple, the man may have ofered to carry his better-half's ballot to a ballot box.

I wouldn't go so far as to claim nobody voted more than once, but doing so requires either a breakdown in ballot allocation, or one person converting another person's ballot for his own use. Control over the later is not as tight as in an election.

84 posted on 02/24/2016 5:15:56 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dforest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqy56cXEgM0


85 posted on 02/24/2016 5:19:21 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

The Trump speech is great, but so many of his are.

I almost skipped the Cruz speech expecting just another run-of-the-mill thanking campaign workers and looking to the future, as positive as possible under the circumstances.

And it was that.

But it was so much more than that. It was Naked Cruz. Extremely revealing. With dark undertones. And a pathos that sung like the long strum of a base guitar. Almost a work of art but in a dark medium: pathetic, washed-up pseudo-optimism.

It is the Loser Speech for the ages.

No one can honestly watch that speech and honestly say that guy has a chance in this campaign.


86 posted on 02/24/2016 5:19:48 AM PST by samtheman (Elect Trump, Build Wall. End Censorship.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Looks like NV was just a fake election that shouldn’t count.


87 posted on 02/24/2016 5:22:42 AM PST by Beagle8U (Trumpanzees Lives Matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
-- Looks like NV was just a fake election that shouldn't count. --

No question the GOP has had trouble at Nevada caucus events, it did in 2008 and 2012. Republican Nevada Caucuses: A history of turmoil -- RT USA -- 22 Feb, 2016

And also no question, any undertaking of this magnitude is bound to have some irregularities. I don't believe any of the candidates have objected to the results rendered in the 2016 Nevada caucus, so whatever irregularities occurred were likely small scale, unable to change the outcome in delegate allocation.

I don't think your claim of "fake election" is credible - but hey, it's your credibility, not mine. Bring out some evidence of irregularity or uncontrolled ballots that shows a swing of hundreds of votes (however many it takes to move a delegate from one candidate to another), and maybe the party will adjust the allocation of delegates.

88 posted on 02/24/2016 5:32:33 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

It’s all over except for the crying!


89 posted on 02/24/2016 12:48:54 PM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Socialism is forever indebted to Yuppy Conservatism for the distraction it created and maintained over the last 30 years.


90 posted on 02/25/2016 12:17:33 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson