Trump will do what he's always done.
Delegate the most important stuff to the best people, and set out only his vision.
"Build a wall. Boot out illegals. You are granted the abilities to do this, Wall Czar, now go do it."
"Prevent China from abusing our economy. You are granted the abilities to do this, Trade Czar, now go do it."
"Find me a guy who thinks like Scalia, but has little paper trail. You are granted the abilities to do this, SCOTUS Czar, now go do it."
"Get Europe back on it's feet as regards the Muslim Invasion. You will need to be subtle, they are their own countries. You are granted the abilities to do this, Crusades Czar, now go do it."
But there are couple of unspoken predicates which could cause real trouble. First, if Trump really believes that the problem with our trade deals is stupidity, he is more stupid than even I believe. I think he is saying that for two reasons, first, he wants a simple bumper sticker slogan to run a campaign with and, second, he wants to deflect investigation into his own fickle ideology.
The problem with our trade deals is that our politicians have quite deliberately favored one class of Americans over another class of Americans in the negotiations. Our negotiators are not stupid they are highly intelligent and they consciously sold out the rust belt for Silicon Valley, for example. The idea that a smart negotiator will recover jobs in the rust belt by out foxing Japanese negotiators is delusional. This is a political question and delegating it to Carl Ichan, for example, will only get negotiations which advance, Carl Ichan's worldview-or Donald Trump's.
Do you recall some years ago when we restricted the inflow of foreign automobiles? The dealerships of Japanese cars mobilized and got the restrictions removed. There is Newtonian law at play here, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Do we have the foggiest notion of what Donald Trump is going to do in reaction?
In other words, to expand the conversation to matters other than trade, policy decisions are being made by Donald Trump who has an ideology that is undefined, historically chaotic, certainly egocentric so we don't know what we will get. Putting "terrific people" in charge does not tell us a damn thing about what policies will be pursued. When Ronald Reagan was president we knew his ideological bias and we loved it and we trusted him to pursue it.
I'm forcing myself to refrain from saying, "I knew Ronald Reagan â And Donald Trump" But you get my drift.