D@mn straight only political connections can do that. Clinton emails for instance.
Notice how you flipped the premise? This is a dishonest technique of debate in which an opponent restates what someone said with a different premise. It's a form of lying.
Lack of prosecution in the Hillary situation is the result of corruption at the Justice Department, and it stems directly from Obama. This is a case where those who are tasked with enforcing the law refuse to do so.
The Apple court order is a case where those who are tasked with enforcing the law, are doing so.
No you claim no one can ignore a court order, I just showed you that they can.