Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
You mean "recompile an existing product with an extremely tiny modification." If you don't, that's what you ought to mean.

Apparently you know very little about software development, cryptography and the like. It is probably technically possible to do what is being asked, but it is a lot more complicated than just recompiling some code with a few tweaks.

Ask the Courts. It has been standard practice to insist on cooperation from Telephone companies since the 1900s, and Banks since probably 1788.

Yes, to use the existing technology to assist. Not to require them to develop something new.

174 posted on 02/25/2016 2:46:36 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative
Apparently you know very little about software development, cryptography and the like. It is probably technically possible to do what is being asked, but it is a lot more complicated than just recompiling some code with a few tweaks.

Why, does Apple encrypt their code while their coders are writing it? Seems like that would make it D@mn near impossible to get anything done. :)

No, the code is written, than ran through their encryption mess, but at the top level, it is straightforward readable code.

Yes, to use the existing technology to assist. Not to require them to develop something new.

And there you go again with that "develop something new" dodge. Every time they recompile it is "something new."

If you know how to write code, you know that recompiling and creating version "New.x" is nothing.

179 posted on 02/25/2016 3:14:24 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson