Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yosemitest

No one took Vera’s house, but her heir’s ultimately sold it for 1/3 of what she was offered.


26 posted on 02/22/2016 11:31:08 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Repeal The 17th
Donald "EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" Trump still TRIED VERY HARD and AT a LARGE COST to UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TAKE someone else's HOME for his OWN PERSONAL GAIN !
HOW DISGUSTING CAN YOU GET ! ? ? ?

Donald Trump view of "EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE USE" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL !
Read the history of "Eminent Domain" for yourself.
Donald Trump didn't have the power to take it, as a private citizen.

BUT ...the Government taking someone's property and giving to Donald Trump's company, DID GO AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION, pure and simple !
If the government take someone property, just to give it to another private company, because they think they can get a larger tax income from the deal,
then it IS WRONG AND ILLEGAL as the LAW was ORIGINALLY INTENDED TO BE !

It's UNCONSTITUTIONAL !
So ... the guilty SHOULD BE BLAMED !


Once again, this is Donald Trump's vision of private property rights when he was just another private citizen.
So, AGAIN I SAY ....
    Imagine how much more damage he could do as the leader of the Federal executive branch.

32 posted on 02/22/2016 11:50:37 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Repeal The 17th

Eminent domain is NOT an issue for the president. It is firmly a judicial matter. What does it matter how the prez feels about it?


92 posted on 02/23/2016 4:16:31 AM PST by Baldwin77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson