Just replying to be polite. Otherwise, your response is so far out in left field it can’t be pulled back into a reasonable discussion.
You're the one siding with Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Justices Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and all the other leftists that want to overturn Citizens United v. FEC. In your own words:
"Citizens United is corruption legalized."
And when gleeaikin states:
"I don't understand why Conservative and Tea Party folk would want to have the big money guys running everything. And as for "strict construction" and Originalism, I doubt that our founding fathers ever intended for Money to be Speech or for Corporations to be People."
You reply:
"Very well put. I agree with you."
You and gleeaikin are the ones way out in left field.
Furthermore, neither one of you can tell me which "big money guys" are running Citizens United.