Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan

Really? Why didn’t Obama have “an obligation” to vote up or down on Bush’s nominees?

Obligations, they’re not just for Republicans any more!


5 posted on 02/22/2016 2:35:14 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Still Thinking
Really? Why didn't Obama have "an obligation" to vote up or down on Bush's nominees?

Exactly. No Democrats came out pushing for a vote on Bush's nominees. As a matter of fact, Democrats have always pushed for no vote on nominees during election years, when it was a Republican in the White House. They said it was the right thing not to vote in a nominee during an election year.

15 posted on 02/22/2016 2:39:04 PM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Still Thinking

“Kirk...added that it is the “right of the president” to nominate someone to the Supreme Court...”

No, it’s his duty and responsibility, not his right. the Constitution does not give the President any special “rights”. Not a one.


34 posted on 02/22/2016 2:46:53 PM PST by beelzepug (2 Timothy 2:23 Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson