Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b4its2late

Stupid tactically.

The President has every right and arguably the obligation to appoint a justice. The Senate has the job responsibility to consider the president’s appointment. The Senate has zero obligation to approve.

Instead of letting the process play out the way the founders intended (including refusing to confirm whatever whackjob is nominated)the Republicans come off as infantile, lazy, unconstitutional and overly partisan.


5 posted on 02/22/2016 11:07:53 AM PST by RedStateRocker (Better questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RedStateRocker

No, it’s better not to let it come to a vote, but they should allow the process to proceed . . . s - l — o —— w ———— l -———————— y. It should never come up for a vote, and the Senate should never officially be in recess for as long as the socialist thug in is power. We are better off taking our time to schedule hearings, taking a long time for the hearings, and then not concluding the hearings due to other commitments and demands on their time, rather than giving them a straight rejection that will be played as “racist” (motivating their base) and allowing for a second nomination that must also be blocked.


6 posted on 02/22/2016 11:14:38 AM PST by Pollster1 ("A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson