I know Apple had nothing to do with the crime and they don't own the phone. The court can compel them to do exactly nothing, unless of course we have morphed into some form of the Soviet Union. I'm beginning to wonder about that one.
I responded to your statement that the phone had nothing to do with the crime. Now you have changed it to Apple having nothing to do with it. My challenge stands. The phone contains evidence and has everything to do with the crime. My question mentioned nothing about Apple, which is a different discussion.