Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agrarianlady

In case no one bothered to listen to the context of the discussion it was not about the mandate to be forced to buy insurance. It was about that small area in Obamacare that says insurance companies must accept those with pre existing conditions. Whether you agree about pre existing conditions or not, at least keep the issue clear.


27 posted on 02/19/2016 8:51:28 AM PST by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nclaurel
In case no one bothered to listen to the context of the discussion it was not about the mandate to be forced to buy insurance. It was about that small area in Obamacare that says insurance companies must accept those with pre existing conditions. Whether you agree about pre existing conditions or not, at least keep the issue clear.

The requirement that insurance companies accept those with pre-existing conditions is not a "small area in Obamacare" - it is a HUGE cost, and was the very reason for the individual mandate. Repealing If you were to repeal the individual mandate, but not the pre-existing condition requirement, you would destroy the insurance market.

It's why Obamacare must be repealed in full, not piece-by-piece. It's a disastrous house of cards - try to tinker with just one piece, and it will bring down the whole thing.

90 posted on 02/19/2016 11:14:09 AM PST by zedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson