Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1
It is specious to say the term wasn't defined in the Constitution. The only words defined are words that don't have commonly agreed meanings. The Founders used the term with purposeful knowledge of the definition widely held at the time. They based a great deal of the Constitution on the writings of Vattel and, evidenced by the communications & letters the Founders have left as records, paid particular heed to his section on Natural Born Citizenship. There are court cases that further reinforce the definition of the term as used in the constitution.

The current effort by BO and others to make the term Natural Born Citizen meaningless is a purposeful assault on our Constitution and National Sovereignty.

"212. Of the citizens and natives."

"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.

We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country."

56 posted on 02/19/2016 7:00:31 AM PST by JayGalt (Come not between the nazgul and his prey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JayGalt
are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

That is exactly what we were taught in school (many years ago but closer in time to the writing of the constitution than we are now.)

98 posted on 02/19/2016 7:14:52 AM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: JayGalt
"212. Of the citizens and natives." "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

*********

And that father in Edward's case would be Cuban or Canadaian, would it not?

140 posted on 02/19/2016 7:34:19 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson