“EVERY ONE of them was debunked by the Bush administration.”
No, they weren’t.
The sarin ied was a binary mix in flight sarin shell that Iraq did not possess prior to 1995 and the booting of the inspectors.
Further, we kept finding the darn things.
And ISIS just fired mustard gas shells.
You can’t fire shells that have been buried, you would have to find shells stored in something like, I dunno, a bunker.
Will you admit we found them?
Especially since the CIA bought 400 borak sarin rockets?
http://m.townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/02/17/yeah-iraq-had-wmds-cia-bought-them-from-secret-dealer-n1958246
“known as Operation Avarice, began in 2005 and continued into 2006, and the American military deemed it a nonproliferation success. It led to the United States’ acquiring and destroying at least 400 Borak rockets, one of the internationally condemned chemical weapons that Saddam Hussein’s Baathist government manufactured in the 1980s but that were not accounted for by United Nations inspections mandated after the 1991 Persian Gulf war.”
So, which one did the Bush administration stand up on and say, “Finally, we have FOUND wmds in Iraq. Our search is over. Our position has been proven.”
Which one?