[OldSaltUSN]

Then, it doesn't matter what I say, or how much time I put into documenting the issue, you have a "faith" issue here. You believe that Cruz shouldn't be running for President, and regardless if the issue is citizenship, his character, or his policy positions, citizenship is the hammer you'll use to beat upon him with, just as Trump and Rubio use groudless pejoratives towards Cruz like "nasty" and "liar".

Conversely, there's about a 90% chance that you're a diehard Trump acolyte, which is why the negative Cruz citizenship reappear daily.

I'm just not wasting the time playing the TrumpRepublic game.

[Cboldt]

-- Then, it doesn't matter what I say, or how much time I put into documenting the issue, you have a "faith" issue here. --

I have faith issues, but not on this subject. Again, all I asked in the first place was whether your research included Bellei and WKA, and if it did, how did you factor them into your analysis. There is no faith involved there, those are SCOTUS precedents, and either you knew about them (and maybe factored them in), or not. If you had factored them in, I had no preceonception of how you saw them, that's why I asked.

-- I'm just not wasting the time playing the TrumpRepublic game. --

No sweat. As I said in the first place, if those cases don't ring a bell, our conversation on the subject is over.