Frankly, you don’t know what you are talking about at all. If you think otherwise, then you just go right ahead and cite the law that grants natural born citizenship to a person, and I’ll show where you are wrong. Also note, you have to be 2000cc short of brain matter to think a child born abroad with a U.S. citizen mother can be a natural born citizen while a statutory law was enacted by Congress to grant U.S. citizenship to such a child provided the conditions were met, including the condition for the father to become a naturalized U.S. citizen. Hint, if it were possible for such a child to be a natural born citizen the Section 320 provision would have been entirely redundant, unnecessary, and superfluous. You guys cannot even think straight and make any logical sense whatsoever with your own self contradictions.
I explained what 320 was about. Sorry you do not understand it, and cannot see that you are projecting upon that portion of code things which are not there.
I already explained what is not there.
Try to find what it is I was talking about and interact with that, rather than attempt to tell me that I do not understand, and then give me "any true scotsman" fallacy while talking about capacity of brain matter.
The codes do stipulate that Cruz was a citizen at birth, there being no mention of persons born in the circumstances that he was, being in some other way "naturalized".
We've been through this before, you and I.
And what came to light but that yourself (and others too who invented the line of argument you have been presenting) in order to make it work had to rely upon argument arising from reliance upon language within laws regarding citizenship AND immigration from decades (if not more than a full century) prior to those laws having been greatly altered.
You simply cannot continue to import language from codification of laws ---which have been subjected to change--- as if those laws still read the same way.
Or else -- we may as well go back all the way to the language in the original 1790 code.
The last time I mentioned that on another thread -- you ran away.