Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BlueDragon
Exposing more of your BS...
According to your faulty reasoning, since persons whose conditions of birth who are written about under heading of "Naturalization" are "naturalized citizens" for reason of being being mentioned/listed in that beginning portions of the statute --- then ALL persons born in the United States are somehow "naturalized" for reason of being;
a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;

Since I know the difference between positive law and natural law you're not accurately portraying my position.

171 posted on 02/21/2016 6:23:20 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: BlueDragon
You do know the difference between positive law and natural law, don't you?
172 posted on 02/21/2016 6:27:18 AM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamiin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson