Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bidimus1

Having heard the Town Hall and actually watch Trump speak as Anderson spoke...I still believe that Trump was referring to a mandate as to regards of pre-exisiting conditions. Perhaps you have a different interpretation. At the time of the broadcast, that was my take away. The Person that asked the question was also satisfied with the answer...so I assume that the audience member asking was satisfied that Trump was also referring to pre-exisiting conditions.

All I can say these days, with all the candidates everyone is taking the role of examining the entrails of chickens to divine the true meaning as to what was said by whom and when.

I will admit that Trump does not speak in a very direct manner.

If your takeaway of the conversation is different than mine, so be it.

Have a good night.

abigkahuna


103 posted on 02/18/2016 11:45:21 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: abigkahuna

And how can a mandate on pre-existing conditions work? Now everyone can stay off health insurance, then wait until they get sick and then buy it?

There’s a reason Romneycare and Obamacare fine you for not having insurance. They had to in order to force the insurers to cover pre-existing conditions. They have to give people an incentive to get insurance, otherwise people simply won’t sign up until they’re ill.

Trump’s liberal dream of universal health coverage is an unworkable pipe dream without having an either partial government takeover of health care like Obamneycare, or complete socialized medicine. The government HAS NO BUSINESS making universal health coverage its goal. That is either socialism or it’s a legal mandate that will put insurers out of business in about 24 hours after passing.


105 posted on 02/18/2016 11:49:14 PM PST by JediJones (RUSH LIMBAUGH on TED CRUZ: "This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

To: abigkahuna

Thank you your statement was most elegant, and well thought out. I disagree if in nothing else that djt, answer was a ramble but I have heard nor read anything from him on the subject with any more clarity.

To be most honest few things of complexity or import that he has spoken on have be very clear.

Mostly boosterism and self congratulations is what I have read and heard for the man.


107 posted on 02/18/2016 11:52:12 PM PST by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson