Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gdani

It’s ridiculous to maintain the only purpose for intercourse should be pregnancy.


I agree.


19 posted on 02/18/2016 9:52:32 AM PST by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: laplata
It’s ridiculous to maintain the only purpose for intercourse should be pregnancy.

The Church never maintained that this was its only purpose, otherwise there'd be no allowance for relations during pregnancy. The idea is for each act to be open to life, whether it is likely to happen or not. In like wise, nutrition is not the ONLY reason we eat, but if we install vomitoriums and puke so we can eat an unlimited amount, that is sinful.
25 posted on 02/18/2016 9:57:24 AM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: laplata
I'll go on record as a Catholic with the “only purpose” declaration although continuing relations for an older couple and relations for pleasure for a married couple during non-fertile periods are, of course, permissible.
39 posted on 02/18/2016 10:11:39 AM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OMorgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson