Good answer. I’m not convinced by the idea that a war on Jihad means a war on all of Islam. I’m more concerned that that failing to name the enemy means the root cause never gets addressed
As to our efforts to placate the “good Muslims” who will never attack us unless we offend them...well, how far do we go in letting them into the US, or is excluding Muslim immigrants too provocative?
Do we endlessly trim branches or get at the root? Is there a way to do it that doesn’t involve WWIII, and if Europe falls to the hordes coming in, what then?
Interesting times. It’s also interesting to note who the least Hawkish of the Republican candidates is on the debate stage, when it comes to using force. Trump, for all his puffed up image, seems to want to use leverage and deals instead of force where possible.
The Chamber has often been our worst enemy -- they're the guys who sold scrap iron to prewar Japan, they're the guys whose tankers lay alongside German tankers transferring Texas crude to Nazi bottoms the day before Pearl Harbor, and they're the guys (fronted by Loral Corp and the megatraitor Bill Clinton) who sold the ChiComs two or three different critical strategic subsystems to make their Long March missiles a real threat to us.