Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor

What can be stated as fact and without any vitriol is that many court decisions over the last nine years have ruled that anyone who qualifies as a “Citizen of the United States at Birth” also qualifies as a “natural born citizen.”
There have been no court rulings over the last nine years which found that there is a distinction between a “Citizen of the United States at birth” and a “natural born citizen”.


200 posted on 02/18/2016 2:57:14 PM PST by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

“What can be stated as fact and without any vitriol is that many court decisions over the last nine years have ruled that anyone who qualifies as a “Citizen of the United States at Birth” also qualifies as a “natural born citizen.””

The Court also ruled that men can marry men, and that you can be forced to buy a product from a private company. So much for relying on the Court for fodder to back up foreigners as natural born citizens.


202 posted on 02/18/2016 3:28:54 PM PST by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson