Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
From your excerpt of the Katyal/Clement article:

And Congress has made equally clear from the time of the framing of the Constitution to the current day that, subject to certain residency requirements on the parents, someone born to a U.S. citizen parent generally becomes a U.S. citizen without regard to whether the birth takes place in Canada, the Canal Zone, or the continental United States.

If the touchstone is "citizen-at-birth," these authors have overlooked the statutes that confer US citizenship at birth, regardless of the citizenship of the parents, to persons born in Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

Would those persons "naturally" be citizens without an Act of Congress?

Would Cruz be a citizen without an Act of Congress?

Not to say that "Act of Congress" is the touchstone for NBC. Rather, "citizenship that depends on Act of Congress" is the touchstone for naturalization. At least "so says SCOTUS and all the other courts."

115 posted on 02/17/2016 4:00:44 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
Would Cruz be a citizen without an Act of Congress?

Would any of us be?

117 posted on 02/17/2016 4:17:53 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson