Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke

An immediate Intel based screening for travelers that met red flag criteria. It’s my understanding that foreign Intel services had done of those guys on lists. I’m not saying that we could have definitely made a stop, but by most accounts, the effort want there. They were suspicious of the sources of the warnings.


57 posted on 02/16/2016 7:50:09 PM PST by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: catbertz

“An immediate Intel based screening for travelers that met red flag criteria. It’s my understanding that foreign Intel services had done of those guys on lists. I’m not saying that we could have definitely made a stop, but by most accounts, the effort want there. They were suspicious of the sources of the warnings.”

Bush took office on 20 Jan 2001. The towers fell on 11 Sep 2001. Some, if not most, of the attackers were already inside the US When Bush took over. Do you really think anything new security system Bush could have implemented would have forestalled this attack?

Sure, we could have done better but the fault lies with Clinton, not Bush.

BTW, I’d really like to see such a security system. Problem is, you’d never get it approved since any system good enough to be effective would be criticised as ‘spying on American citizens’.


61 posted on 02/17/2016 5:24:51 AM PST by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson