Change the “family” court system and divorce industry from what it is now—a bastian of feminazi liberalism gynocracy on a mission to financially destroy middle class white men under the guise of false chivalry and then you’ll have many more converts.
And they wonder why the western world birth rate is so low compared to those under sharia law—the complete opposite and other extreme of western “family court.”
120 years ago, if the woman ran off, the husband received full custody.
Now “equal” women can run off, keep the house, kids, car AND wallet of the man merely by making false accusations, thus kicking him out. The parental alienation shortly ensues.
Several good points there. I must say, emotions do seem rubbed raw in this debate. To be clear, I have known good women who were treated horribly by bastard husbands, and I know good men who were tortured by immoral wives.
For men, I think two points must be made clear, and they are judicial, legal, and cultural points that cannot be disputed:
1. The family court/divorce system in America is bias towards women and it is corrupt. There is simply too much evidence out there to dispute this fact. Men know it. Yes, there is the rich husband who lawyers up well, but even in those andectodal cases, he is still running against the hurricane force winds of a system biased against men.
2. The abortion laws in the this nation are a tragedy, and the father of a child has no say as to whether his unborn son or daughter will be murdered. This is a crime against father, against children, and against God. Men know it - and they are powerless against our evil and wicked system. This injustice fuels their distrust, desperation, and outrage, and rightly so.
I have a long standing policy of not sharing personal information on public forums such as this. I do discuss public info like the fact I live in Texas. So I will just say I have tons of personal experience in this area. I agree that there is a lot of injustice when it comes to divorce and custody of children.
I proposed a simple solution (though not a panacea) for making things more fair. Give the party not seeking divorce preferential treatment when it comes to property and custody unless it is proven (not just asserted) that the spouse is responsible for causing the divorce based on physical abuse, adultery, substance abuse, or some other extreme cause of harm to the marriage and family.
I came up with a method for fairly splitting something between two people a long time ago also. It works for a lot of things. For example, there is one piece of pie left and two children get to split it. Let one split it, and let the other pick a piece. To a certain extent you could do this with property in a divorce.