Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Toespi

You obviously are dwelling on certain posts if you are saying that Bush is the only thing being discussed here. Did you miss the Scalia commentary yesterday or were you too busy defending the indefensible?

I will say it again, I don’t care whom are candidate is as long as they are in favor of: supporting 2A, border enforcement, illegal removal, being against court enforced affirmative action, anti: uneven trade deals, Obamacare, common core, fag marriage. The one who hits all or most of these gets my vote. IOW, it is Trump or Cruz or Carson. I do not want Jebster or kasich or Rubio. That said, I will vote for whomever the GOPe candidate is as I cannot see myself not voting or voting for a dem, not today, not ever.


96 posted on 02/16/2016 6:44:11 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: Mouton

I am not talking about Free Republic, although there has been considerable piling on against GWB, since Trump conveniently gave the sheep a diversion. I am talking about the news, nothing but re-litigation of whether GWB could have prevented 911, Bush lied about WMD, water boarding, etc.

Donald Trump is not running a corporate takeover but he doesn’t know the difference. If he gets the nomination, is he going to sue the DNC when they put together a montage of DT excoriating GWB and the Republicans for 911, WMD, PP? He is either working for the other side or he doesn’t have any idea how it works.


99 posted on 02/16/2016 6:54:13 AM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson