Posted on 02/15/2016 12:34:39 PM PST by Aliska
Photos and more than 350 "intense" letters from Pope John Paul II to a married woman he corresponded with for more than three decades have been found at the National Library of Poland, Deutsche Welle reports, via a BBC documentary. The notes and imagesâoften showing the pontiff, who was made a saint in 2014, in casual wearâreveal a friendship between himself and American philosopher Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka that included holidays spent together and an intimate relationship that historians are trying to figure out. "Here is one of the handful of transcendentally great figures in public life in the 20th century, the head of the Catholic Church, in an intense relationship with an attractive woman," a Christianity history professor at Cambridge University tells the BBC, which notes there's never a "suggestion [he] broke his vow of celibacy." "I would say they were more than friends but less than lovers," Edward Stourton, the documentary maker, tells AFP, via Deutsche Welle.
(Excerpt) Read more at newser.com ...
Hopefully you did not take from my rant that it was an acceptance of homosexual acts. Suffice it to say that abortion, gay marriage and the terrible molestation of young boys by vile homosexual priests are all an abomination. There must be no tolerance for a corrupt clergy.
“except in mutual acts of husband and wife that are in themselves apt for the generation of new life, is grave matter—i.e., mortal sin.”
Nope, there is only one mortal sin. Rejecting Christ as your savior. Everything else is man made. Regarding all else, sin is sin, and there is no difference. Stealing a pencil is the same as visiting a prostitute. It just means you are a sinner who needs salvation.
If celibacy is so conducive to homosexual corruption, then why are all the pro-homosexuals the ones to invariably condemn the discipline of celibacy?
Freegards
“It made me think of St. Teresa of Avila and St. John of the Cross. I would say they had a very intimate relationship where there was no sexual expression towards one another. That’s what I choose to believe anyway.”
Spiritual closeness and a deep abiding non-sexual loving relationship is beyond a secularist understanding.
I don’t know if you can strive for spiritual closeness or it just happens. But Jesus said there would be no marriage in Heaven. To me, that implies that there will be no sex but still loving relationships, maybe even more loving than on earth.
“Isn’t he the pope who said it was wrong to have internet relationships?”
Referring to on-line intimate relationships that may involve a sexual component or a detachment from your loved one.
It is a far different thing to share a spiritual bond, a deep non-sexual love like the Pope did.
Agree.
“To me, that implies that there will be no sex”
Therein lies the difference between Christians (believe Heaven is a spiritual thing), whereas to muslimes, “heaven” to them is nothing BUT sex, pleasures of the flesh.
I guess declaring love is better than declaring sexual desires.
What absolute rubbish. Stealing a pencil is the same as abortion or fornication?
It’s brainless, mindless, stupid nonsense like this that give Christians the reputation of being brainless, mindless, and stupid.
The notion that married clergy was the norm until the 12th Century is a myth—a piece of propaganda.
PERPETUAL AND PERFECT CONTINENCE has been the norm for deacons, priest, and bishops since the Apostles.
AND IT IS STILL THE LEGAL NORM. That’s right: All the married deacons and married priests (there are no married bishops) who are having sexual relations with their wives are violating Canon Law. And I’m talking about the 1982 Code of Canon Law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.