Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: napscoordinator

Do you know WHY they were against doing an autopsy? Could be anything, from belief they already know why he died, to trying to protect his legacy, to simply being in shock, to something more sinister. Seems to me, if for no other reason to prevent just these types of discussions, an autopsy would have been ordered.


13 posted on 02/15/2016 12:22:52 PM PST by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: dinoparty
There is simply NO good reason to NOT do a thorough, complete, and comprehensive autopsy; and, that the results should be made public immediately.

Further, the autopsy should include a team of forensic specialists, and should be trustworthy beyond question.

.

25 posted on 02/15/2016 12:27:45 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except for convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: dinoparty
Seems to me, if for no other reason to prevent just these types of discussions, an autopsy would have been ordered.

Do you think that the conspiracy types are going to believe an autopsy that tells us the overweight, 79-year old, cigarette-smoking Associate Justice died of a heart attack?

56 posted on 02/15/2016 12:36:52 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson