I don’t see the “strong armed part”. The vast majority of of the references to Trump in the case are related to the exhibits of the agreement/proposal between Trump and CDRA for Trump to build a casino and how Trump was bound if CDRA acquired the specific property in question and transferred it to him.
In the judge’s opinion the binding was not sufficiently specific and that was the reason the case was decided against CDRA.
The point is that Trump used the eminent domain power of the CRDA for the purpose seizing private property for his own use. The court records confirm this.