Skip to comments.
Ted Cruz, Homeschooling, S.306, Dishonesty and Pig-Ignorance
Red State ^
| February 12, 2016
| streiff
Posted on 02/12/2016 12:18:29 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Anyone who believes such bilge deserves tyranny.
2
posted on
02/12/2016 12:19:21 PM PST
by
alstewartfan
("I came back as a large hippopotamus." Al Stewart)
To: Iowa David; JWinNC; RasterMaster; SunshinesStormySummerSon; duffee; The Final Harvest; ...
If you would like to be added to the TED CRUZ 2016 PING LIST drop me a FReepmail.
|
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The left is scared of Cruz and so stories like these will continue.
4
posted on
02/12/2016 12:23:36 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I almost wish you hadn’t posted this here. You’re giving our #ouchebags/trolls ideas. I expect to see this argument made on FR, soon.
5
posted on
02/12/2016 12:27:59 PM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Is Home Schooling in Danger of Federal Oversight?
- Is S. 306 good for home schoolers?
Yes. S. 306 is a very good thing for home schoolers because it allows home schoolers who so desire to save money with the Coverdell Education Savings Account to do so. Legislation like this allows families school choices that may not otherwise be affordable, including home schooling. Anyone who does not want to participate in this program is free to not do so. - Does Title 1 of S. 306 apply to home schoolers?
No. Title 1 of S. 306 applies exclusively to public school students and students at accredited private schools. Home schools are not accredited private schools and would thus not be included under this section. - Does Section 201(a) of Title 2 change the federal definition of home schools?
No, it does not. Coverdell Savings Accounts have previously been available only to private school students. This section states that âFor purposes of this sectionâ the term private school includes home schools.What that means is that in Title 2 of this bill (dealing exclusively with Coverdell Education Savings Accounts), the term private school will include home schools, the effect of which is to make home schoolers eligible for the Coverdell account. However, this definition is exclusive to this section. It does not have any effect on Title 1 of this bill or upon any other part of federal or state law. - Will S. 306 lead to more regulation of home schools?
No, it will not. Under the bill, the parents are allowed to use their own funds in their own savings account to pay for their own expenses. The argument that the federal government will come back and try to regulate the use of that account for home schoolers after this bill is passed is not a risk of this legislation, but of our system of government in general.Our system of government allows for changes in regulations that can impact families already participating in a program. However, this fear is not a legitimate argument for depriving someone of his or her rights or freedom to participate in a savings account because future regulation could always happen with any bill. Furthermore, future regulation would only impose restrictions on families choosing to use the account.States that define home schools as private schools are already eligible to use these accounts, and no federal regulations due to Coverdell accounts have been imposed upon home school families. If they ever did, the parent could simply stop using the account and therefore avoid any newly written and imposed restrictions. - Why are some people concerned about this bill?
Concerns about S. 306 have typically focused on two areas:
6
posted on
02/12/2016 12:30:11 PM PST
by
DrewsDad
(Choose Cruz - The Consistent Constitutional Conservative)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
If Ted Cruz supported FEDERAL regulation of home schools, I am certain that I would have heard about the fact.
Since I haven’t (and I would have heard, believe me) been informed about the notion, I am certain Ted Cruz is not in that camp.
7
posted on
02/12/2016 12:30:34 PM PST
by
SoFloFreeper
(I am undecided between Carson, Cruz, Rubio & Trump...)
To: alstewartfan
alot will, as soon as they see the title.
Cruz is the anti Christ, dontch know /s
8
posted on
02/12/2016 12:30:48 PM PST
by
dp0622
To: alstewartfan
I don’t even understand the anti-Cruz argument here. If homeschoolers are worried about Federal interference, all they have to do is not set up a Coverdell. I’m not a big fan of the HSLDA (their definition of homeschooling is too narrow for me), but if they think this bill is good, I think it unlikely it steps on homeschooling rights.
9
posted on
02/12/2016 12:35:32 PM PST
by
Amity
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I saw the same thing when I briefly lived in California. The homeschoolers there were generally against school vouchers. They aligned with the far left on this issue. It was strange. They were convinced that school vouchers would result in government regulation of private and Christian education.
Homeschoolers that are this naive probably do not deserve the freedom to home school their children. But, thank God, we often do not get what we deserve.
10
posted on
02/12/2016 12:35:51 PM PST
by
unlearner
(RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The HSLDA is authoritative on issues like this, and they give the Lee Bill its blessing.
11
posted on
02/12/2016 12:37:26 PM PST
by
Dr. Sivana
(There is no salvation in politics)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
12
posted on
02/12/2016 12:38:15 PM PST
by
HarleyLady27
("The Force Awakens"!!! TRUMP;TRUMP;TRUMP;TRUMP!!! 100%)
To: SoFloFreeper
Since I havenât (and I would have heard, believe me) been informed about the notion, I am certain Ted Cruz is not in that camp.
Some of your fellow Trump supporters are pushing the very idea.
13
posted on
02/12/2016 12:38:20 PM PST
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: txnativegop
The Trump people are scared of Cruz and so stories like these will continue.
14
posted on
02/12/2016 12:38:25 PM PST
by
TBP
(0bama lies, Granny dies.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Libs HATE home schooling.
All the more reason...:o)
To: TBP
that goes without saying, but you are correct.
16
posted on
02/12/2016 12:40:11 PM PST
by
txnativegop
(Tired of liberals, even a few in my own family.)
To: TBP
The Trump people are scared of Cruz and so stories like these will continue.Well, before too long Trump WILL place his "trump" card. Yes, I'm a bridge player. THINK of what his PR people could do with his name:
Trump's no lump. He's the Ace of Trump.
At gas stations: This pump is for Trump
At gym: PUMP for TRUMP!
A new dance: the Trump Bump.
Don't "cross" Cruz; he'll NAIL ya to it.
Grumpy Cruz: Cross Cruz.
I'd cross the street for Cruz.
His son is Chris Cross.
.
And so on.
.
.
Heeheehee. That was fun.
To: HarleyLady27
“...From this an assorted collection of poltroons and imbeciles have constructed the argument that this bill creates a “federal definition of homeschooling” and will subject homeschooling to federal regulation. That anyone would believe a bill written by Ted Cruz and Mike Lee would actually do that tells you all you need to know about the sheer number of idiots there are on the internet. Take this #ouchebaggery, for instance:
http://americanvision.org/12995/cruz-bill-will-bring-homeschoolers-under-federal-regulation/
To: Cincinatus' Wife
To: Cincinatus' Wife
This article misses the mark completely! The fact that the program is a federal program, by ones act of participating in that program, one has brought themselves under the authority of the program, that authority being the federal government.
So, NO! This is NOT a good program for those who homeschool their children. We had set up one for our granddaughter who is homeschooled and later closed it after discovering the well hidden dirty little secret to the 529 plans, it is a contract with the federal government that allows the feds to determine how those dollars can be spent.
20
posted on
02/12/2016 12:50:45 PM PST
by
patlin
("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson