Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Art in Idaho
Doesn't the following put it to rest, or am I missing something?

:Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"

Only if you believe the constitution can be amended by a statute, rather than an amendment.

Call me old fashion, but I don't think you can change the meaning of constitutional requirements set in 1787 by laws enacted in 1952.

213 posted on 02/12/2016 1:21:41 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
Only if you believe the constitution can be amended by a statute, rather than an amendment.

Call me old fashion, but I don't think you can change the meaning of constitutional requirements set in 1787 by laws enacted in.

Oh, interesting point. The statute doesn't define the law? It's adopted US Code. I'm stepping out of my range of knowledge here. I'm not an attorney, but I thought the US Code was 'the law' and binding in court?

I can see where this needs to be cleared up, once and for all.

245 posted on 02/12/2016 7:22:02 PM PST by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only Hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson