The CITY attempted to use eminent domain, not Trump. The ad claims Trump did it and wants people to believe Trump was the main actor.
If the ad were truthful, at best it would say something to the effect that the government entity attempted to use eminent domain for Trump's benefit.
It's just typical deceitful advertising. Nothing new.
Trump was the main actor. The city would not have condemned the property if it were not for Trump’s desire to have it.
If you read the court opinion, you would have seen that the city had absolutely no plans to ever use it for a publis purpose. Trump cospired with the city in an attempt to take the property. And yes, I know Trump did not succeed; ut it wasn’t for lack of trying.
A distinction without a difference.