Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

I have not heard him spell out yet what he means by: “The good ones”

Nor has he spelled out what he means by: “let them come back”

The good ones: In my opinion, I would only consider ‘good’ those who have not committed any crimes or taken any welfare/stamps/tax credits. They would be criminals and perpetrators of fraud.

Come back: I would only allow them in for renewable one year worker permits; renewable ONLY from their own country.

Anchor babies: current law says they are US citizens, and no judge I can think of would permit their deportation UNTIL that anchor baby interpretation is removed.


111 posted on 02/12/2016 11:13:41 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I would simply enforce our more-than-reasonable laws—and thus none of them would be eligible to return.

But you, of course, are not in line for the presidency, whereas Trump is.


128 posted on 02/12/2016 1:31:32 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson