Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: silverleaf

My understanding is that ROEs preclude soldiers from firing on any “civilian” structure, which basically means no return fire on any building in Afghanistan. Add that to not being anle to fire on those who toss down their rifle only to move to another plus many other absurdities...and the stupidity of COIN as a military strategy..partnering with child raping Pashtuns...training Taliban moles who turn their weapon on American soldiers...its a far cry from the days of Iwo Jima.


18 posted on 02/10/2016 7:15:06 PM PST by A Conservative Thinker (Ted Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: A Conservative Thinker

My understanding is “no fire unless FIRED upon”

And so, incredibly:

If through binoculars you directly see men planting an IED, you cannot fire on them, as you are not under fire from them.

Also, armed men know they can simply through down there weapons as a defense, as they cannot be fired upon if unarmed.

Also if they prefer to remain armed but unmolested they know to immediately enter any structure, as they then cannot be fired upon, “no firing into structures”.

Basically this is the ‘stan version of Obama’s air-war on ISIS:

Fake.


21 posted on 02/10/2016 7:47:34 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson