Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ManHunter

“Effectively” or officially by passing a law in direct defiance of federal law because of stated reasons why the federal law is unconstitutional? That is exactly what is needed against these and other unconstitutional federal acts.


6 posted on 02/10/2016 9:41:53 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

I don’t disagree with your premise at all. I just object to the selective indignation and response of the federal government, whether it be DHS, DOJ or any other out-of-control federal entity. But that pretty much includes all of them, doesn’t it...


7 posted on 02/10/2016 9:49:25 AM PST by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216

Easy-peasy. Just make sure to get a bunch of paper, so they can fill in the Bill #, the ‘anti’ line and churn out a bunch.

“___ is hereby null and void in the Republic of XYZ, having violated the constraints of A1S8 and 9th/10th Amendments of the Constitution and used to punish, harass and eat out their substance of the Citizens of this fine State.”


13 posted on 02/10/2016 11:13:19 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson