Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump vows to push LGBT rights, hedges on pro-marriage litmus test
LifeSiteNews ^ | 2/8/16 | Lisa Bourne

Posted on 02/09/2016 8:53:30 AM PST by wagglebee

CONCORD, New Hampshire, February 8, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – Does Donald Trump support the gay agenda or oppose it? On the eve of the New Hampshire primary, observers are still scratching their heads about where the GOP frontrunner actually stands.

Trump has repeatedly and consistently said he supports the natural definition of marriage, but can a President Trump be relied on to promote it resolutely and cogently? It is this question that has many marriage activists expressing concern about his increasingly likely hold on the GOP nomination.

In fact, the National Organization for Marriage has gone so far as to say that Trump has “abandoned” the pro-marriage cause.

Trump himself underscored the problem on the weekend when he told a New Hampshire television station that from the White House he would push “equality” for homosexuals even further forward.

A cable news reporter self-identifying as a lesbian asked him last Thursday after a rally in Exeter, "When President Trump is in office, can we look for more forward motion on equality for gays and lesbians?"

“Well, you can and look - again, we're going to bring people together. That's your thing, and other people have their thing,” Trump told Sue O’Connell of New England Cable News. “We have to bring all people together. And if we don't, we're not gonna have a country anymore. It's gonna be a total mess.”

Following the comments, Trump appeared Sunday on ABC’s This Week program with George Stephanopoulos and would not commit to appointing Supreme Court justices who’d overturn Obergefell, though that would be his “preference.”

“We’re going to look at judges. They’ve got to be great judges. They’ve got to be conservative judges. We’re going to see how they stand depending on what their views are. But that would be my preference,” he told Stephanopoulos. “I would prefer that they stand against, but we’ll see what happens. It depends on the judge.”

Trump’s comments follow his statements during a Fox News Sunday interview last week, when he said, “If I'm elected, I would be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things, but they've got a long way to go.” 

“[Marriage] should be a states rights issue,” Trump continued. “I can see changes coming down the line, frankly.” 

When asked by Fox if he “might try to appoint justices to overrule the decision on same-sex marriage,” Trump replied, “I would strongly consider that, yes.”

The real estate mogul criticized the Supreme Court for the Obergefell decision imposing homosexual “marriage” on all 50 states last June, but then later in August, Trump voiced support to NBC News for banning companies from firing employees on the basis of sexual orientation. “I don't think it should be a reason” to fire workers, he said at the time on Meet the Press.

The National Organization for Marriage (NOM) and a number influential evangelicals have endorsed Senator Ted Cruz in the race for president. The Texas senator has not only committed to appointing pro-marriage justices, but says the president and the states can rightly defy the “fundamentally illegitimate” ruling just as President Lincoln defied the Dred Scott decision.

NOM has also been highly critical of Trump, saying he has “abandoned” their cause. The organization said in its January 27 blog post just prior to the Iowa Caucus that “Donald Trump does not support a constitutional amendment to restore marriage to our laws. Worse, he has publicly abandoned the fight for marriage. When the US Supreme Court issued their illegitimate ruling redefining marriage, Trump promptly threw in the towel with these comments on MSNBC: ‘You have to go with it. The decision's been made, and that is the law of the land.’”

NOM had said the week before that Trump “has made no commitments to fight for marriage, or the rights of supporters of marriage to not be discriminated against and punished for refusing to go along with the lie that is same-sex 'marriage.'”

New Hampshire voters have been tracked as showing support for homosexual “marriage,” as a poll last February showed 52 percent of Republican NH primary voters saying opposing gay “marriage” is unacceptable.

The latest CNN/WMUR tracking poll shows that overall 33 percent of likely Republican primary voters support Trump, giving him a growing 17-point lead over the nearest GOP contender. RealClearPolitics polling average in the state puts him at 31.0 percent support, with Marco Rubio second at 14.7, John Kasich third at 13.2, and Ted Cruz fourth at 12.7.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: 2016issues; bs; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes; samesexmarriage; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
Trump obviously believes that promising a wall will get him elected.
1 posted on 02/09/2016 8:53:30 AM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AFA-Michigan; AKA Elena; APatientMan; Abathar; Absolutely Nobama; Albion Wilde; ...
Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


2 posted on 02/09/2016 8:54:20 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

What practical difference does it make?


3 posted on 02/09/2016 8:55:43 AM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Trump obviously believes that promising a wall will get him elected.

Everything is up for negotiation with TRUMP.
4 posted on 02/09/2016 8:56:12 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

He said “You can...(look for progress)”

Didn’t promise anything. Bogus posting, this one above.


5 posted on 02/09/2016 8:56:26 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Can we stop pretending Trump is conservative now?

Pro gay

Pro socialized med

Pro amnesty (after the wall)

Pro crony capitalism (when he’s the crony)


6 posted on 02/09/2016 8:56:40 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It will.


7 posted on 02/09/2016 8:56:41 AM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Trump’s going to lose a lot of people on that one. I’m beginning to wonder if Trump’s going to lose this thing. Cruz is the only other conscionable candidate IMO, but can Cruz beat the rest of these yahoos and whoever the Dems prop up?


8 posted on 02/09/2016 8:56:58 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I listened to it.

That’s not what he said. He said he’d work for unified action on solving all of the problems the nation faces that he was talking about before he was asked this homosexual question.


9 posted on 02/09/2016 8:57:03 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

All Trump ever gives are glittering generalities.

This is as solid as anything else he’s said.


10 posted on 02/09/2016 8:57:27 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Beware Obama's Reichstag Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

He is not saying anything really. He is hedging, trying to be on all sides of the issues. All he is after is votes.


11 posted on 02/09/2016 8:58:18 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
No, in all honesty he didn't promise anything.

His responses are mush. The tough guy punted.

12 posted on 02/09/2016 8:58:47 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
All Trump ever gives are glittering generalities.

You are correct in this, as DT learns the ins and outs of getting elected President. That's a reason why I still cannot choose between DT and TC.
13 posted on 02/09/2016 8:59:20 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

He did not say what is claimed here, He responded to a loaded leading question that said it with a deflection saying he wanted to bring people together. Its dishonest to claim he said it and shows desperation.


14 posted on 02/09/2016 8:59:35 AM PST by Mechanicos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

He wants to unite with sexual deviants but not Conservatives. But the BTOKBSU crowd can’t see that.


15 posted on 02/09/2016 8:59:37 AM PST by txhurl (I'm NO LONGER with the Nasty Canadian '16 (well, unless he wins ;))(and he did))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This article misses the point that Ted Cruz is a nasty, cheating P***y!


16 posted on 02/09/2016 8:59:41 AM PST by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
All he is after is votes.

I see your point.

Other candidates aren't?
17 posted on 02/09/2016 9:00:37 AM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The wall seems to be his best issue.
He’s come out on 3 sides of a lot of other positions and issues. Left, Right, and Moderate.


18 posted on 02/09/2016 9:01:54 AM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
That’s not what he said. He said he’d work for unified action on solving all of the problems the nation faces that he was talking about before he was asked this homosexual question.

More generalized stuff meant to say absolutely nothing.

Not sure how you think you can trust this guy xzins.
19 posted on 02/09/2016 9:02:17 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Appointing Judges matters, and CRUZ would be solid on this, Donald Trump, I am not so sure.

This I know if we get a Donald Trump President that “Builds the Wall”, yet we have judges on the Supreme Court who are leftists in majority, as well as the circuit courts, EVERYTHING (Possibly even his “WALL”) will be shot down from the day after they get through Congress (and I don’t trust the “deals” which would be made in that Congress).

-JS


20 posted on 02/09/2016 9:02:47 AM PST by JSDude1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson