We dont have a tax COLLECTION problem, we have a SPENDING problem. As long as we focus on collection and not the issue of spending, we are only rearranging deck chair
We dont have a tax COLLECTION problem, we have a SPENDING problem. As long as we focus on collection and not the issue of spending, we are only rearranging deck chair.
______________________________________________________________
This is absolutely correct. In addition to Cruz’s tax plan he is also looking to eliminate the following departments, from his website:
I. FIVE FOR FREEDOM
Abolish the IRS, the Department of Education, the Department of Energy, the Department of Commerce, and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. A Cruz Administration will appoint heads of each of those agencies whose sole charge will be to wind them down and determine whether any programs need to be preserved.
Internal Revenue Services – end the political targeting, simplify the tax code, and abolish the IRS as we know it.
Department of Education – return education to those who know our students best: parents, teachers, local communities, and states. And block-grant education funding to the states.
Department of Energy – cut off the Washington Cartel, stop picking winners and losers, and unleash the energy renaissance.
Department of Commerce – close the “congressional cookie jar†and promote free-enterprise and free trade for every business.
Department of Housing and Urban Development – offer real solutions to lift people out of hardship, rather than trapping families in a cycle of poverty, and empower Americans by promoting the dignity of work and reforming programs such as Section 8 housing.
II. TWENTY-FIVE FEDERAL “ABCsâ€
Empower the people by reducing the alphabet soup of Agencies, Bureaus, Commissions, and other programs that prop up special interests, at the taxpayer’s expense. A Cruz Administration will identify all unnecessary programs – these 25 are merely a start:
Eliminate the following Agencies, Bureaus, Commissions, and programs:
Appalachian Regional Commission
Climate Ready Water Utilities Initiative
Climate Research Funding for the Office of Research and Development
Climate Resilience Evaluation Awareness Tool
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Corporation for Travel Promotion
Global Methane Initiative
Green Infrastructure Program
Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program
Legal Services Corporation
National Endowment for the Arts
National Endowment for the Humanities
New Starts Transit Program
Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund
Presidential Election Campaign Fund
Regulation of CO2 Emissions from Power Plants and all Sources
Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Vehicles
Renewable Fuel Standard Federal Mandates
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
Sugar Subsidies
Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery
UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
UN Population Fund
USDA Catfish Inspection Program
This is a good start.
>>We dont have a tax COLLECTION problem, we have a SPENDING problem.
Bingo. The pigs in the bureaucratic farm house don’t care how the sheets on the beds get laundered — as long as they’re the ones sleeping in them.
A flat tax will destroy retirement savings and accelerate the demise of the elderly competition who might put actually think they’re entitled to all those Socialist “security” dollars they’ve paid into the Ponzi scheme while WORKING.
Damn tootin’ we have a COLLECTION problem TOO!
We have ~47% whom don’t pay, of which, the bottom ~5% who get $$ ‘back’ they never earned (EITC/etc.).
It also doesn’t count on those whom work under the table or those whom have retired, etc. (IE: Those that still utilize services, but pay $0).
Yes, we have a spending problem too, but it’s disingenuous to say it’s NOT a 2-way street.
***
I have yet to hear what each candidate thinks is the TOP rate they think ANYONE should pay, and why.
I’d LOVE to hear what how much of MY life the Fed. govt owns. Unfort., I don’t suspect to ear the question even asked.