consider the paradox. Liberals and certain courts assert that a Christian baker can be heavily fined for refusing to sell a specially created work of art due to his objections to the content and purpose of it, but the same type of liberals support a liberal musician refusing to allow their work of art from being used due to their objections to purpose of it. Likewise in the case of musicians or other artists for hire being compelled to make a work of art promoting what they object to.
Excellent catch.
Why is it that LIBERALS are the ones who want to control what others do, except when it involves sex or murdering babies?
Because (a bit deep) as proxy servants of the devil who acted as the original liberal elite, climbing up some other way (in the original Occupy Movement: Is. 14) than obedience in response to grace, they seek to be autocratic leaders, who, as with the devil doing with Eve, (Gn. 3) gain power by instilling into souls the victim entitlement mentality, with themselves as the saviors of those who are "oppressed" due to (them or others) not obeying the Divine principles by which benefits are lawfully gained. Once they have incited those in "economy class" to rise up to subjugate those in "business class" out of lust for their benefits, then these saviors sit alone in autocratic control, with the rest impoverished and dependent on them, to give them the homage they lusted after and see themselves as worthy of. In short, they become as God as much as they can in terms of power, not character.
In contrast God needs nothing, (Acts 17:25) and is constantly giving, and at His own expense redeems those who deserve damnation, and then even rewards the obedience which He motivates and enables, so that "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne." (Revelation 3:21) To God be the glory.