Proof? Maybe the timeline is not “proof” enough for you and most likely will never be. I typically find the author to be honest. Read it for yourself. Was it a “dirty trick”? On its face of what we know now, yes. Did it really matter? The only way of knowing is to look into the hearts of those who were there and changed their minds, or made them up while in the venue.
We know from entrance polls that it did not change much, but do we know how many going in were undecided and may have been swayed? Nope, therein lies the conundrum that those who support one side or the other will use to their advantage.
We know who the serial posters are for one side or the other and quite frankly, I have gotten to the point that when I see certain posters I just blast right past them. Why waste my time to read what I know the template already is?
http://www.steynonline.com/7445/that-smell-isnt-the-ethanol
Would those on the fence, undecided, or slightly leaning toward Carson consider that they had “changed” their vote? No way. But the disinformation would have adversely affected Carson. Remember, we’re talking of only 4 per precinct and not of a mass migration.
It’s not the committed to Carson who are the issue.
Gosh, all they did was ask you for proof.
And you go off on a rant 12 paragraphs long and still provided no proof.
Calm down. No one is after you.