Voting fraud is the Democrats' "stock and trade."
Besides, it will so embarrass the GOPe - who have been covering for widespread Democrat voter fraud as much as the liberal media.
Posted on 02/04/2016 9:52:46 AM PST by Zakeet
Personally, I think an examinaton of the "coins" used in that toss might be in order.
Yeah, let them stuff ballot boxes like normal Democrats...................
Ever since I heard of those SIX coin flips that ALL went the Hildebeast’s way ... 64-to-1 odds, right? ... I’ve been trying to imagine how they could allow that to be rigged.
When and where did each alleged coin flip happen? Were they out in the open, announced ahead of time, providing to any and all with any interest in the outcome, ample opportunity to watch?
After the 2012 caucus results debacle, the Republican Party of Iowa had to know they were on thin ice. It would be too bad if it turns out to be Democrat shenanigans that cause us to lose our first-in-the-nation status.
LOL! Yes, but where are those coins now?
Over Vince Foster's eyes.
Corruption in the Democrat party? Say it ain't so!
To make the caucus scene complete they should hold it in cemeteries. That way it would be much more convenient to gather names to cover whatever deficit of votes the “inevitable” candidate’s team might encounter.
If the Des Moines Register; a liberal rag birdcage liner thinks something is fishy and wants to investigate; it must REALLY be fishy. Unless their REAL motive is to steal more votes from Bernie, and give Hillary an actual lead over him.....at least on paper.
Des Moines Register calls for audit of Iowa results: ‘Something smells in the Democratic Party’
That is a funny headline.
The Register endorsed Hillary, so you know it must be bad if they are calling for an audit. This is very uncharacteristic of the Register.
The RNC and the DNC have designed the Caucuses to do two things: 1) to test the Organization of individual candidates, and 2) to winnow the field.
Both of those goals have been met.
Do I suspect the D results were rigged? Do bears poop in the woods? It is a time honored trick on the D side to withhold results from a few big precincts so they can “find” unreported ballots. It happened Caucus Night, but the news media isn’t wise to this trick and only mentioned it in passing.
I can only think of one reason: Corruption.
One week after the 1996 caucus, when I tried to get precinct-level numbers from the Republican Party of Iowa, I was told "we don't have those numbers any more."
Maybe I should try again.
This is YUGE. A MSM rag like the Des Moines Register would not turn on a Clinton unless they had something really juicy on her.
I think we have some common ground with them on this matter.
The problem is nobody really will know a lot of it, but there are some "math sheets" being gone over. A lot of their voting was hand raising, ayes and nays, can hardly audit that and any video evidence would be sketchy.
The party head for the state is a Hillary supporter and worked for her in 2008, had a dinner for her. Has Hillary 2016 license plates. They are saying at du that the party doesn't want to release some of the count data. They are also accusing Hillary of positioning her people in certain key positions.
The DMR endorsed Hillary, as noted by many.
Glad this has come up, and on our side, too, in a different way. Missed most of what Rush was just saying about it.
Read a lot thru the politico article, too. Many, many comments same as du. A lot over there had written Hillary off when the Epstein and Bill business became known which was a year or two ago. That hasn't come up yet.
It does not matter who votes. What matters is who counts the votes...J. Stalin (patron saint of DNC)
Voting fraud is the Democrats' "stock and trade."
Besides, it will so embarrass the GOPe - who have been covering for widespread Democrat voter fraud as much as the liberal media.
Foster’s eyes
Ahhhhh-— now that was good! He probably voted about six times too.
They want the Democrats to be transparent?! What a joke. Obama promised the most transparent administration in history. What we got was the most secretive, corrupt and nontransparent administration in history.
Now there's an earth shaking revelation!/s
The Donald is bitching and moaning about Cruz cheating meanwhile the cheating was most likely done by Hillary Clinton. Is Trump making a fuss to take the heat off his friend H.C.? Probably.
http://www.decisiondeskhq.com/
Hillary is ahead by 0.2 percent of 9,901 votes. That is 20 votes. 3.1 percent of the votes are missing, more than 300 votes, all from precincts believed to be favorable to Bernie Sanders. Of course this is a corrupt setup. Besides, it’s Hillary. Even democrats expect sleaze from her.
You mean...Old Crusty is musty?
Apparently the Register's editorial board doesn't understand that nobody can audit chaos.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.