To: Controlling Legal Authority
Here is the complete article:
For those of you who havenât had time to research the details of the recent brouhaha between Ben Carson and Ted Cruz, hereâs a quick rundown of the facts.
- Monday, February 1 – Carsonâs campaign announced that he would be delivering his post-caucus speech before the caucus results came in and then would immediately fly not to New Hampshire but rather to his home in Florida. This is how campaigns usually signal their candidate is about to drop out of the race.
- Monday, February 1, 6:29 p.m. – Marco Rubio supporter Conrad Close tweeted, “Rubio campaign pushing the narrative hard that Carson is dropping out. Obviously looking to pick up votes from Carson.”
- Monday, February 1, 6:43 to 44 p.m. – CNN went on the air with the report Carson was flying to Florida immediately after the caucuses and thereafter would not be going to New Hampshire or South Carolina to campaign but rather would be attending the National Prayer Breakfast on Thursday, February 4.
- Monday, February 1, 6:43 p.m. – Simultaneously with the start of CNNâs broadcast announcement that Carson was going home, CNN reporter Chris Moody tweeted Carsonâs campaign was now stating he would remain in the race after the caucuses.
- Monday, February 1, 6:44 to 6:57 p.m. – Carson became âfuriousâ at the report he was dropping out of the race and talked to his business manager Armstrong Williams and possibly other staffers, ordering them to quash the rumor. He retweeted a stafferâs tweets stating he was staying in the race.
- Monday, February 1, 6:57 p.m. – Time reporter Tessa Berenson tweeted, âIm with Carson now, “I’m going home to get some fresh clothes,” he says.â
- Monday, February 1, 6:58 p.m. – PBS reporter Lisa Desjardin tweeted Carson was not dropping out of the race but returning to Florida âto get more clothes.â
- Monday, February 1, 6:59 p.m. – Washington Post reporter Bob Costa tweeted he had just received a call from Armstrong Williams notifying him Carson was not dropping out.
- Monday, February 1, 7:00 – 9:00 p.m. – During the course of speeches as part of the caucus procedure, one or more Cruz precinct captains may have stated Carson was going home after the caucuses and possibly also that he might be about to drop out of the race. The details are disputed.
- Monday, February 1, 7:20 – While the caucuses were in session, Cruz supporter Iowa Congressman Steve King tweeted, âCarson looks like he is out. Iowans need to know before they vote.â
- Monday, February 1, 8:28 p.m. – While the caucuses continued, MSNBC reporter Benjy Sarlin tweeted an official statement from Carsonâs communications director stating Carson was not dropping out of the race but rather returning to Florida to âget a fresh set of clothes.â
- Monday, February 1, 8:49 p.m. – Tessa Berenson tweeted that Ben Carson was accusing Cruzâs campaign of dirty tricks for stating it looked as if Carson might be leaving the race.
- Tuesday, February 2 – Ted Cruz apologized to Carson for the mistake, adding, “Last night when our political team saw the CNN post saying that Dr. Carson was not carrying on to New Hampshire and South Carolina, our campaign updated grassroots leaders just as we would with any breaking news story. That’s fair game. What the team then should have done was send around the follow-up statement from the Carson campaign clarifying that he was indeed staying in the race when that came out.â
- Tuesday, February 2 – Carson responded to Cruzâs apology by stating, “As a Christian I will accept the apology.â However, as a presidential candidate he apparently did not accept it, for he went on to repeat his demand that one or more Cruz staffers be fired.
- February 1-3 – News organizations continued to express amazement at Carsonâs decision to take a break from the campaign in order to go home and get more clothes, something that is unprecedented among presidential candidates during active campaigns.
Summary: Whether deliberately or by mistake Carsonâs campaign released a statement that would normally be taken as indicating he would soon be withdrawing from the race. The timing of the statement was such that it appeared in broadcast news minutes before the start of the caucuses. After hearing the report on CNN, Carson ordered his campaign to correct it, creating two hours of confusion during which contradictory tweets flew in all directions. This confusion coincided with the time the Iowa caucuses were in session. Â Afterward, in frustration at his own campaignâs mistake, Carson accused Cruz of dirty tricks. Cruz generously apologized for the misunderstanding. Carson less generously continued to demand the firing of Cruz staffers.
2 posted on
02/04/2016 9:13:01 AM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Mountain out of a mole hill.
3 posted on
02/04/2016 9:13:37 AM PST by
taxcontrol
( The GOPe treats the conservative base like slaves by taking their votes and refuses to pay)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Does anyone seriously give a crap?
Has there ever been a clearer indication that the media simply wants to twist your freaking head around, Exorcist style, over nothing?
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Saw Posted on facebook:
6 posted on
02/04/2016 9:18:25 AM PST by
justlittleoleme
(Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Before the Iowa Caucuses, Carson was at 7.7% in the RealClearPolitics average of Iowa polls.
Trump was leading Cruz by nearly 10 points.
Iowa result:
Ben Carson 9%, Trump 24%
Carson did BETTER in Iowa than polled, Trump did worse.
Therefore, guess who’s demanding a recount? Not Carson.
To: Controlling Legal Authority
I had wondered who tipped off CNN. Now we know it was a Rubio staffer.
And how many people did the Rubio people convince to vote for Rubio?
11 posted on
02/04/2016 9:21:22 AM PST by
Slyfox
(Ted Cruz does not need the presidency - the presidency needs Ted Cruz)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
Ted Cruz will always be know as the guy who won a tainted victory in Iowa then disappeared.
16 posted on
02/04/2016 9:22:49 AM PST by
McGruff
(We're not in Iowa anymore Heidi.)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
I stopped reading because the title of this article is dishonest. This supposed “fact sheet” is laced with opinion.
20 posted on
02/04/2016 9:24:44 AM PST by
ironman
Carson is being more than a tad coy. It’s not necessary for him to fly home for a change of clothes. There was more going on.
23 posted on
02/04/2016 9:27:18 AM PST by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
i served for many years as a gop precinct captain in cook county suburbs ... the word piety is not in the job description. during primary season pretty much anything goes. politics is not bean bag ... not even close.
26 posted on
02/04/2016 9:34:27 AM PST by
TheRightGuy
(I want MY BAILOUT ... a billion or two should do!)
To: Controlling Legal Authority
The question know one has bothered to ask is,who is this Rubio Donor Conrad Close?
Why has he not been mentioned? His tweet was 15 minutes before CNN went on the air with the story,I smell Rubio dirty trick
40 posted on
02/04/2016 11:00:53 AM PST by
ballplayer
(hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson