The day before the caucus the Des Moines Register showed Trump ahead by 3% with both Cruz and Rubio gaining ground over their previous poll. Even Trump didn't predict that he was going to win in Iowa that I am aware of. Cruz won by 3.3%
Now I admit that I only took a year of calculus in college but even with my limited mathematical abilities, 3% positive to 3% negative seems more like 6% to me. And polls are dynamic and it appeared that a shift was taking place. It appears that you are using Cruzmatics to come up with the results that you want. The definition of Cruzmatics is lying about numbers to manipulate people... just another tool found in the old Cruzbox.
“The day before the caucus the Des Moines Register showed Trump ahead by 3% “
I know, but several Trump supporters posted polls that same day saying Trump was 17% ahead of Cruz and that the 3% was an outlier and the 17% was accurate. Just look at the thread today about Trump dropping in the national polls. Every Trump supporter is claiming it is an outlier because Trump is now only 4% ahead of his rivals.
Trump came in 3.3% behind Cruz so 17% plus 3.3% is a 20.3% underperformance according to those Trumpanzee polls.
“It appears that you are using Cruzmatics to come up with the results that you want”
See, like a typical liberal Trumpanzee on FR, you resort to making accusations and calling people liars rather than asking the pertinent clarification question. I didn’t lie about anything. I even argued that the 17% polls were the outliers, but was shouted down by your fellow bully Trumpanzees so now I’m using Trumpanzee arguments against them. Basically, Trump underperformed 6.3%-20.3%, which is substantial either way you look at it.
Trumpanzees are now touting the poll showing Trump ahead by 26% in NH so if he only wins by less than 5% then that will be another 20% drop.
I’m sure you and other Trumpanzees will lie that you never believed the 26% polls and you always knew it would be a close race/s