Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Flip flop, flip flop, flip flop Teddy; he flips and flops more and faster than a flag in a tornado!


2 posted on 02/04/2016 1:20:26 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

Cruz didn’t flip flop, Roberts did.


9 posted on 02/04/2016 1:33:38 AM PST by kik5150 (Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
Have you stopped to consider that the judicial philosophy of the Chief Justice Roberts of 2005 is a seemingly totally different philosophy of the Justice Roberts of 2016 and that Justice has made some judgements in the last 3 years that are astoundingly bad and obviously contrary to the law.

It's almost as if Roberts is being threatened or blackmailed on major cases.

For whatever reason's, Justice Roberts has changed under Obama and the change is for the much worse.

Pretty much everyone has changed their evaluation of Roberts.

it's not a flipflop when when you revaluate your opinion and support of a once brilliant Constitutional lawyer who has went over to the dark side

11 posted on 02/04/2016 1:35:28 AM PST by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

Enjoy:

But for the record, I never liked O’Connor, Souter, Kennedy, or any of the others who voted for things they imagined they saw. I like Rehnquist, Thomas, and Scalia. And yes, I do think that Roberts is in that mold.

181 posted on 7/22/2005, 2:30:35 PM by nopardons

Scallia likes the Roberts’ nomination; so do a lot of others on our side.

Since Thomas and Rehnquist vote the sames way, what’s the difference/problem?

24 posted on 7/21/2005, 1:30:17 AM by nopardons

Scallia is DELIGHTED with the nomination, so are Mark Levin and Michael Barone, and the president.
And even Scallia and Thomas have diverged in the past, with Thomas being on the right side of things.

25 posted on 7/21/2005, 1:34:30 AM by nopardons

Even Scalia and Thomas have been on different sides, at times. But Roberts is NO Souter! Souter was much more of an UNKOWN, when he was nominated, than Roberts is.

30 posted on 7/21/2005, 1:47:30 AM by nopardons

Funny...

Hypocrite much?


23 posted on 02/04/2016 2:17:34 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

This is a reasoned revoke of support, not really a flip flop.

It was Robert’s own actions on the bench that caused Cruz to reconsider.


50 posted on 02/04/2016 4:34:46 AM PST by lifeline (The Bible alone and in its entirety is the Word of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons
Flip flop, flip flop, flip flop Teddy; he flips and flops more and faster than a flag in a tornado!

Well, in the case of John Roberts and his own flip flops, I would say that this was one situation that deserves a change of mind. I know that my mind has changed concerning Roberts, given his strange opinions. How about yours?

51 posted on 02/04/2016 4:38:07 AM PST by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

Flip flop, flip flop, flip flop Teddy; he flips and flops more and faster than a flag in a tornado!
_____________________________________________________________

Roberts had a sterling record PRIOR to going to the USSC. Since then his record has been terrible. Cruz is man enough to admit that supporting him for the court urned out to be a mistake.

COntrast this for example to someone like Trump who won’t admit that even his bankrupt companies were a mistake and never felt he had to ask God for forgiveness after a history of adultry and running strip clubs on his properties.


55 posted on 02/04/2016 5:14:53 AM PST by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: nopardons

Such flip-flopping is irrelevant. None of us really know how “our” candidate will act in office until in office and performing. Anything up to that point is, for the most part, speculation. We attempt to surmise how they will act in office based on past or current behavior, but never really truly know until it is too late. Hell, many pubes were happy to see Roberts on the bench. Now, not so much.


67 posted on 02/04/2016 7:48:17 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson