To: Helicondelta
And that's a way of pointing out that there are legitimate uses for eminent domain and there are self-serving ones that do nothing for general public. Trump's use was for Trump. It was an abuse of what can be a useful legal tool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmM4ZBoppNQ
19 posted on
02/03/2016 6:25:07 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution. Go Cruz.)
To: elhombrelibre
The keystone pipeline will be private property just like the Trump hotel. The hotel creates jobs, etc.
To: elhombrelibre
Trump's use was for Trump. Are you saying that only Trump benefits from Trump, Inc. does?
48 posted on
02/03/2016 6:37:34 AM PST by
GBA
(Here in the matrix, life is but a dream.)
To: elhombrelibre
And that's a way of pointing out that there are legitimate uses for eminent domain and there are self-serving ones that do nothing for general public. Trump's use was for Trump. It was an abuse of what can be a useful legal tool.
-----
Eminent domain is how the Keystone pipepline will be built and it is not a govt run highway program but a private for profit enterprise to the benefit of Canada - Cruz's homeland. Trump's version spews out casino chips and the other oil - but other than that no difference.
70 posted on
02/03/2016 6:53:42 AM PST by
Trumpinator
("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson